- I really had high hopes for LispPAD from Tony but I certainly understand why that project was shelved. Dale The formatting is one of the reasons I loathe Vlide. One time I loaded up a long set of routines and it formatted 'em into total illegibility. Later I learned you can alter the formatting or turn it off, but - haha - too.
- 绿色先锋下载为您提供Fireworks Mac免费下载,Fireworks Mac(Swift代码开发)是苹果平台上的开发软件。Fireworks Mac可以实时生成Swift代码，您可以在没有任何第三方库或依赖项的情况下在iOS或MacO项目中使用这些代码。.
- LispPad is a 'lightweight' integrated development environment from Matthias Zenger for developing and running Scheme programs on the Mac. CVE / CVE Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could run arbitrary code in.
What You Need to Get Started For this session, you will need/want:. AutoCAD 2021 (or AutoCAD 2016 and later). Notepad. Visual LISP Integrated Development Environment (VLIDE). Visual Studio (VS) Code and the AutoCAD AutoLISP Extension. Materials for this session from the AU website o Handout o Additional Materials Extract to C:DatasetsSD468505.
'Dave' <stee...@bellsouth.net> writes:Listpad Class
> What's your editor of choice? notepad?...emacs? Has anybody used
> lispPad yet? Is it even available yet?
this is a religious question. Like most of them, there are probably a
dozen threads or so in the last few years on the topic of which editor
is best for Lisp development. Still, it's an important question.
Especially with the vast number of (new) editors popping up in the Linux
community (from GNOME, KDE, and just random free stuff), it's nice to
ask what other people are using, just to see if there's something out
there that you're missing out on, just because you don't know about it.
Listpad
I still believe that XEmacs is the best overall editor for Common Lisp
programming. Here are the following reasons:
1) ilisp-mode is mostly universal, and works with most major CL
implementations.
2) If you're using Franz's ACL, then they ship with the eli/ directory
containing a nice UI.
3) You get to program your own extensions in elisp, which can be very
similar to CL, and which can call most CL functions.
4) XEmacs works in Win32 and virtually all Unix environments.
5) XEmacs will simply never die out.
6) You can find ways to hack the editor to do what you want it to do
just about every time, and often, if it's a useful hack, it's
probably already been done, and there's someone on comp.emacs.xemacs
willing to give you a hand.
7) Since CL programming (and virtually _all_ programming) is often done
along with a variety of other languages (e.g. Perl, Csh, C, Java,
etc.), it's nice to have an editor which handles other languages as
well.
8) XEmacs is the most customizable editor that exists, as far as I know.
9) w3-mode, which is a simple web browser, is a standard package for
XEmacs that works well, and lets you read hyperlinked HTML docs such
as the CLHS while programming -- and all in the same editor. There
are even modes for (X)Emacs which allow you to quickly fetch
definitions from the CLHS with a simple command.
Besides those, it's free. If you know what you're doing, you _never_
need to use the mouse (which is a productivity thing). I think it's the
obvious choice, and as I've tested out many editors, XEmacs is my
(religious) choice.
Lisppad
hope this helps,
dave